Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] HF underground (update)

Manuel wa5vxi at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 20 18:14:32 UTC 2012


Bob, nothing in Mammoth is easy. Even with cooperation from park service, finding places to lay out HF dipoles without disturbing something of historical may prove to be a challenge. 

You might be surprised at some of the minuscule things considered to be important. 

Best of luck, would like to be in on the trip, but probably not possible. 

Now where did I put that carbide lamp?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 20, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:

> I just added a map showing the best locations for 5 vertical HF links
> (every mile topside) and a concept drawing.  Now all we need is someone to
> lay two dipoles on the ground about a mile apart and see what the topside
> link looks like on say 80m.
> 
> http://aprs.org/cave-link.html
> 
> Again, these are LONG wire antennas, not practical in mud-crawling
> caves... but here we are playing in Mammoth where it would be easy.
> 
> Bob, WB4aPR
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf
> Of Jim Lux
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:07 AM
> To: aprssig at tapr.org
> Subject: [aprssig] HF underground
> 
> On 11/20/12 4:00 AM, aprssig-request at tapr.org wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Cool project..
> 
> 
>> HF VERTICAL LINKS:  I just realized that since HF penetrates a few
>> hundred feet vertically, we can use HF to link up to the surface every
>> 7 hops or so.  Just an FT-817 with a DIPOLE above and below ground
>> hooked to a TNC can provide the link  Once above ground, then hops
>> continue on VHF.
> 
> 
> The attenuation is quite high for HF propagation underground (1-10
> dB/meter). And, while going lower gets lower loss, you also run into
> antenna efficiency issues if you don't use a full sized antenna. Most
> people propagating RF in this kind of application use loop antennas, by
> the way.
> 
> Bear in mind also that parts of that cave are full of water, and I
> suspect that the rock strata are also quite wet. Propagation through
> water is worse than through rock.
> 
>> 
>> Each vertical link takes up 2 hops, but it sure beats having to do 14.
>>  We need some people experimenting with HF packet FM (with squelch) on
>> 80m (below ground since it would not be legal above ground)...  I
>> gotta do some research on HF links...
> 
> The FCC doesn't care where you radiate, above or below ground.  Either
> your license and service allow a particular modulation or it doesn't.
> And your below ground transmitter will radiate into the above ground
> environment.  In any case, isn't one of your end points above ground?
> Is it receive only?
> 
> You could probably apply for a Part 5 or STA license, if you want to use
> that modulation.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig



More information about the aprssig mailing list