[aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply)
John Wiseman john.wiseman at cantab.netFri Nov 30 22:05:26 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply)
- Next message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
A google seach for "ssid reserved bits" comes up with quite a bit of interesting reading, including the use of the reserved bits by DAMA. For what it is worth, my code always sets the reseved bits in addresses it creates, and normally only sets the "used" bit when digipeating. The exception is that when the SSID of a WIDEn-n is changed, the reserved bits are set as well as the "used" bit. 73, John G8BPQ -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bruninga Sent: 30 November 2012 21:24 To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply) > The RR bits are most likely 00 for every... packet coming out of a > KISS interface to APRSISCE/32. > Now where did I put that AX.25 spec so that I can figure out just > which bits we're talking about... Im sure your replicated them to their defaults which is [11]... but if you didn't, then all of those existing packets are a good test already... To see the definition of these bits, see figure 2.2.13.1.1 in: http://www.tapr.org/pub_ax25.html _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply)
- Next message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail (reply)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
