[aprssig] HF noise measuring campaign reports via APRS
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) ldeffenb at homeside.toMon Sep 17 12:25:14 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] HF noise measuring campaign reports via APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] HF noise measuring campaign reports via APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As I learned the hard way, the upcoming javAPRSSrvr 4.0 release implements a very strict definition of "packet type" with respect to the t/ filter. Any non-3 digit value or value outside the range of 0..255 will not be passed by a t/t (type/telemetry) filter. Any non-type filter that hits the packet will pass it, but not a t/t. My own APRSISCE/32-internal type filter implementation will pass any packet with a type (first) byte matching the type requested that has passed parsing. I only parse for unsigned (per spec) longs of any length (not per spec), and will ignore any fractional parts without complaint (also not per spec). A negative value will probably come through as zero to APRSISCE/32. Per the spec, I require either a # or "MIC" to follow the T, and also require 5 values before accepting the telemetry values and identifying it as a telemetry packet. Bob mentioned at one point an addendum that extended the original 0..255 to allow 3 digits from 0..999, but never came back with a firm pointer to where that may be recorded. AFAIK, floating point values were not mentioned recently. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 On 9/16/2012 11:54 PM, Heikki Hannikainen wrote: > > By the way, a noticeable number of stations do seem to transmit > floating-point values in telemetry. Our perl parser currently accepts > them, I wonder how others treat them? > > The 0...255 requirement seems to be designed for 8-bit decoders, I > wonder if there are any of those around. > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote: > >> I agree that the standard APRS telemetry is definitely the preferable >> approach, but since your example packet (below) showed 8 floating >> point values of apparently some level of precision, I didn't suggest >> a format that only supports 5 values ranging from 0 to 255 (per spec, >> but some say 0..999) that can be scaled based on defined parametric >> equation coefficients. >> >>> 141916z6.999,-100.1,-110.1,-120.1,10.100,-101.0,-111.0,-121.0 >> >> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 >> >> On 9/14/2012 4:40 PM, Chris Moulding wrote: >>> Hessu, >>> >>> Thanks for the information about the telemetry packets. That looks >>> ideal especially when it displays in aprs.fi so well without any >>> software changes at your end! >>> >>> At the moment we are looking at three frequencies but with five >>> telemetry channels available it might make sense to go with five >>> frequencies from the start. >>> >>> 73, >>> >>> Chris, G4HYG >>> >>>> >>>> If there's at most 5 frequencies monitored by a given station, you >>>> could >>>> transmit it as standard APRS telemetry, and it would be graphed >>>> automatically by all APRS receiving stations without any code >>>> changes in >>>> the receiving end. Like this: >>>> >>>> http://aprs.fi/telemetry/a/OH7LZB-14 >>>> >>>> You can also transmit channel names for each graph. >>>> >>>> - Hessu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aprssig mailing list >>> aprssig at tapr.org >>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> > > - Hessu > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] HF noise measuring campaign reports via APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] HF noise measuring campaign reports via APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
