[aprssig] New-N paradigm and LOCALINFO Freq Objects
Stephen H. Smith
wa8lmf2 at aol.com
Tue Sep 24 15:59:27 CDT 2013
On 9/24/2013 4:11 PM, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>> ... [maybe]a directed path rather than WIDE2-1.
>> >For example, you might advertise 146.94-RI
>> >with a path of VERMLN to specifically target users
>> >north of the repeater...
> Seems like a good idea on the surface... BUT... While this may satisfy the
> need to inform users in the VERMLN area, it violates three principles of
> the LOCALINFO paradigm.
> 1) It uses a hop, meaning it will blindly collide with users in the
> VERMLN area because the digi (nor VERMLN) that is sourcing this packet
> into the network CANNOT HEAR ALL THE USERS of VERMLN. Hence the network
> suffers reliability. Hence the rule, only source these at the digi
So HOW DO you reconcile this with the fact that, in the vast open
thinly-populated expanses of the US and Canadian great plains and prairies, the
voice repeater will probably have 2-3 times the range of the co-located
digipeater if you don't let surrounding digis also announce it.
In densely populated coastal areas (especially where rolling hills force a
limit on voice coverage well before you are out of the range of the co-located
digipeater) no hops makes sense. However, in the low-density environment of
the plains, where the digi is virtually guaranteed to "run out of coverage"
long before the voice repeater, 1 WIDE2-1 hop outward from the co-located digi
Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf (at) aol.com
EchoLink: 14400 [Think bottom of the 2-meter band]
Home Page: http://wa8lmf.net
Long-Range APRS on 30 Meters HF
High Performance Sound Systems for Soundcard Apps
"APRS 101" Explanation of APRS Path Selection & Digipeating
More information about the aprssig