[aprssig] Low Alt aircraft path
noskosteve at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 16 20:17:50 CDT 2014
I;m confused. Isn't "WIDE2-1" the path?
73, Steve, K9DCI
From: Randy Allen <ka0azs at earthlink.net>
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:57 PM
Subject: [aprssig] Low Alt aircraft path
I have a ham friend with a MT-AIO that he wants to use in his airplane.
He states he usually operates at 1-2,000 Ft AGL. We have discussed
the issues that have come up with high altitude balloons. He
understands to NOT have WIDE1-1 in the path for this application.
His research is pointing him to WIDE2-1. Given the number of Digi's in
the area, I wonder how no path would work.
One of his concerns is that some of the small airports he uses away from
home are in areas without Digi coverage at ground level and thinks that
no path would not allow him to get a packet out when landed and parked.
I have suggested programming each configuration available to him with a
WIDE2-1 and no path.
Thanks in advance
Randy Allen, KAØAZS
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig