[aprssig] APRS SPEC Addendum 1.2 Proposals
stoddard at pobox.com
Mon Mar 14 17:40:43 CDT 2016
Agreed. We use them to lead teams to locations to address issues.
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 17:27, Curt Mills via aprssig <aprssig at tapr.org> wrote:
> Regarding this web page:
> It says this in the top section:
> "Formats no longer recommended: Compressed-Objects, ITEM Format, Raw Weather Formats,"
> I'd like to put in my thumbs-up for both Compressed Objects, and both Compressed and Non-compressed Items.
> We've implemented these in Xastir and I find them of use in SAR. Compressed format gives much better precision in placing and/or recovering objects, precision you cannot get with non-compressed APRS formats. Items are useful for placing positions when you have no timestamp, as well as providing a shorter packet than APRS Object format.
> In short, I see no advantage to removing formats that are currently used to good effect and already implemented in APRS programs.
> Curt, WE7U
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig