[aprssig] Dirty signals vs. hardware TNCs

Tom Hayward esarfl at gmail.com
Wed May 11 14:25:59 CDT 2016

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:13 PM, spam8mybrain via aprssig
<aprssig at tapr.org> wrote:
> AGWPE or DireWolf (except those programs have other
> issues making them unreliable for something 24/7 like a digipeater).

Can you elaborate?

> Unfortunately, the soft-TNCs do not report the signal quality
> associated with a packet

It's been awhile since I've used DireWolf, but I thought it gave some
metrics, like an integer that could be roughly correlated to
deviation, and the number of bits it had to flip to get a checksum to
match (usually zero).


More information about the aprssig mailing list