[aprssig] Digipeater Symbol Overlays

spam8mybrain spam8mybrain at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 19 12:43:18 CDT 2016


I agree. The linear list of available symbol codes is rather lengthy and unwieldy for finding an appropriate code for beacons and objects in YAAC. Anyone have a better idea for how to organize all the options we're getting with the documented overlay meanings?
Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC 

-------- Original message --------
From: Kenneth Finnegan <kennethfinnegan2007 at gmail.com> 
Date: 10/19/16  1:17 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Frank Knobbe <k4fhk at knobbe.us>, David Andrzejewski <david at davidandrzejewski.com>, TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> 
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Digipeater Symbol Overlays 

I agree with Frank. I would recommend I#.
The confusion is pretty valid; the symbol selection section in the Aprx manual is grossly inadequate; I'll now be updating it once the dust settles here.

--
Kenneth Finnegan
http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Frank Knobbe <k4fhk at knobbe.us> wrote:
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:39 -0400, David Andrzejewski wrote:

> My station NEWBRY is both a high-profile digipeater and a two-way

> igate.

>

> [...]

> It seems like perhaps I# would be better, because although that

> doesn't indicate that it's a two-way igate, it does indicate that it

> is both a digipeater and igate, which T& does not.





I consider a high-digi that Igates to be primarily a digipeater that

also Igates. So, I# (digi with I overlay) would be the better choice in

my opinion.



-Frank







_______________________________________________

aprssig mailing list

aprssig at tapr.org

http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20161019/f2be45b5/attachment.html>


More information about the aprssig mailing list