[aprssig] Txt messaging

Randy Love rlove31 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 10:07:13 CDT 2017


<soapbox>

IMHO, one-way igates are a main enabler of the 'APRS is just a vehicle
tracking system' mentality.

It is so much more, but when anyone can slap an RX-only igate up for
absolutely NOTHING, and it competes with a full-service igate in the same
area and cripples it, you're just hurting the system.

</soapbox>

Randy
WF5X


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Curt, WE7U <curt.we7u at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, chiefsfan2 at cox.net wrote:
>
> We have a pretty decent igate network where this would work well and maybe
>> it would increase the use of texting on our ham network.
>>
>
> Be a bit wary here. A lot of igates are receive-only, so do you no good in
> a 2-way messaging scenario. You may be lucky and live in an area with good
> 2-way igate coverage though.
>
> --
> Curt, WE7U.        http://we7u.wetnet.net
> "Debating an anti-gunner is like debating an arachnophobe about the
> importance of spiders in the ecosystem." -Stephen Wright
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20170831/5d4e84c3/attachment.html>


More information about the aprssig mailing list