[aprssig] IGate FIlter for AMSATS?

Pete Loveall AE5PL Lists hamlists at ametx.com
Sat Feb 25 08:08:32 CST 2017


As a compromise on #1, if the directly heard station has no path, it could be passed to APRS-IS.  This would solely prevent packets heard directly with a path from being passed upstream, not all directly heard packets.  This would cover hearing satellite packets directly since they should never have a path or they should only show digipeated by their internal digipeater (either would be acceptable).

73,

Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete at ae5pl dot net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Pete Loveall
> AE5PL Lists
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 7:14 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] IGate FIlter for AMSATS?
> 
> > And my counter arguments were:
> > 1. This excludes packets originating from the satellites, which are probably
> > pretty interesting.
> 
> Actually, not.  And if the satellite programmer wants originated packets to be
> gated APRS-IS, they can easily have it "digipeated" by the satellite.


More information about the aprssig mailing list