[aprssig] New IGate Operator
stoddard at pobox.com
Tue Jan 3 12:16:28 CST 2017
Reporting over non-RF doesn't mean you're not on RF via voice.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017, at 13:08, Jason KG4WSV wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jim Conrad
> <jjc at oceanviewcom.com> wrote:
>> My thought process is that positions no matter the source of actual
>> hams (not objects) should be reflected on RF which provides a
>> coherent picture for the RF stations.
> IMO you're sort of contradicting yourself. How does giving a picture
> of hams on cell/IP give you a picture of RF? It doesn't. It's noise.
> If they're not on RF, then they don't need to be on RF.
> Now for non-APRS RF resources that may benefit by being announced on
> APRS, which what you may be headed toward, look at Bob's info here:
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig