[aprssig] New IGate Operator (streaming on UHF or VHF)
jjc at oceanviewcom.com
Fri Jan 6 09:41:37 CST 2017
For that to be effective the IGATE would need to have good coverage.
Mine does not so that would not be a viable method without additional
DIGIs. It appears my station can hear many of the local DIGIs but
almost all the RF-IS positions are via those DIGIs not direct to my station.
With the current filters in place and this particular area's network
loading my gating of limited IS-RF positions is having a negligible
impact on the local frequency utilization. For the first time I saw
in my WX3in1 statistics that my station gated IS-RF messages
yesterday. Hadn't seen that before. If anyone cares over the two
previous days my IGATE has gated 4905 packets RF to IS, 6 message
packets IS to RF and 52 position packets IS to RF.
I do like the idea though if I had a location with really good
coverage to act as a high bandwidth mirror of local activity so there
would be no impact on the local primary APRS channel. Might try that
as an experiment on a balloon flight pumping (IGATE to Balloon DIGI
on discrete VHF/UHF and then out on another discrete) out at a higher
bandwidth (9600 or 56k). Have to review the rules to see where that's
legal. UHF only?
At 08:57 AM 1/6/2017, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>The best way to do local IS-to-RF broadcast of lots of activity is
>to simply use an unused UHF frequency. Then you are just streaming
>the data at up to full rate. Locals can see everything. And when
>they are transmitting there, too, they are also seen everywhere.
>Local mobiles who are moving and want to also be seen on local RF
>can operate split band, with their TX on 144.39 and their receive
>side on the UHF channel. Their radio will then see EVERYTHING the
>local streaming IGate delivers. There are plenty of unused PACKET
>frequencies! A third way is to stream on an unused VHF packet
>frequency, but keep the stream down at only say 10 packets per minute.
More information about the aprssig