[aprsspec] Propnet Unique Formats
Ev Tupis (W2EV) w2ev at arrl.netWed Dec 8 03:11:13 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprsspec] Propnet Unique Formats
- Next message: [aprsspec] Propnet Unique Formats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Dimse wrote: > If you use the grid square format, everything after the grid square is a > "comment", but there is nothing wrong with defining the format of the comment to > include parsable data for a specific application. For example, you could include > a timestamp to indicate the report is not real time. Excellent point. Now, we're cooking! I'll give some more thought to this. > If you do this, I would suggest using something like an integer second delay > from the current time (for example t-600 would mean 10 minutes old), the parser > subtracts n seconds from the current time to generate the timestamp. This would > ensure that the data has the correct timestamp in the database. Otherwise, your > data integrity depends on the correct operation of all the client clocks. This > is very dangerous in a non-internet connected computers, unless you use a GPS or > internet NTP, computer clocks are often not reliable. I could see 10 minute > errors having an effect in propagation data mining. Steve, this is very clever! I really like this alot. We hadn't considered this approach. I gotta run this by a couple of folks on the PropNET development list. Thanks for helping to focus the discussion. Kind regards, Ev Tupis, W2EV
- Previous message: [aprsspec] Propnet Unique Formats
- Next message: [aprsspec] Propnet Unique Formats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprsspec mailing list
