[aprsspec] Negative altitudes
Keith Sproul ksproul at rci.rutgers.eduThu Dec 15 15:31:28 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes
- Next message: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This works.. I have seen it and WinAPRS/MacAPRS decodes it correctly. Keith Sproul ---------------------------- Keith Sproul Unit Computer Manager Geology Department Faculty of Arts and Sciences On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 scott at opentrac.org wrote: > Yeah, I was assuming that's how it should be done, but I didn't see it > either. That's the same way negative temperatures are done, so it seems > logical. I've already got Mic-E altitude support working fine, just wanted > to make sure the regular style is supported right. > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aprsspec-bounces at lists.tapr.org > > [mailto:aprsspec-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Tapio Sokura > > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:09 AM > > To: TAPR APRS Specification Discussion List > > Subject: Re: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes > > > > scott at opentrac.org wrote: > > > Is there any standard for negative altitudes in comment > > text? I can't find > > > it in the spec. > > > > All non-mic-e implementations I have seen (= not many) have used > > "/A=-00135", i.e. replaced the first digit with a dash. But > > now looking > > at the spec, I see that this is not explicitly mentioned in it.. > > > > Tapio > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprsspec mailing list > > aprsspec at lists.tapr.org > > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprsspec > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprsspec mailing list > aprsspec at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprsspec >
- Previous message: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes
- Next message: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprsspec mailing list
