Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprsspec] Negative altitudes

Keith Sproul ksproul at rci.rutgers.edu
Thu Dec 15 15:31:28 UTC 2005



This works.. I have seen it and WinAPRS/MacAPRS decodes it correctly.

Keith Sproul

----------------------------
Keith Sproul
Unit Computer Manager
Geology Department
Faculty of Arts and Sciences

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 scott at opentrac.org wrote:

> Yeah, I was assuming that's how it should be done, but I didn't see it
> either.  That's the same way negative temperatures are done, so it seems
> logical.  I've already got Mic-E altitude support working fine, just wanted
> to make sure the regular style is supported right.
>
> Scott
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aprsspec-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> > [mailto:aprsspec-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Tapio Sokura
> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:09 AM
> > To: TAPR APRS Specification Discussion List
> > Subject: Re: [aprsspec] Negative altitudes
> >
> > scott at opentrac.org wrote:
> > > Is there any standard for negative altitudes in comment
> > text?  I can't find
> > > it in the spec.
> >
> > All non-mic-e implementations I have seen (= not many) have used
> > "/A=-00135", i.e. replaced the first digit with a dash. But
> > now looking
> > at the spec, I see that this is not explicitly mentioned in it..
> >
> >    Tapio
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aprsspec mailing list
> > aprsspec at lists.tapr.org
> > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprsspec
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprsspec mailing list
> aprsspec at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprsspec
>




More information about the aprsspec mailing list