[ax25-layer2] different perspective?
pete at ae5pl.net pete at ae5pl.netTue Oct 4 15:51:00 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] KISS Flow Control?
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] KISS Flow Control?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Glenn Thomas > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 10:29 AM > To: Discussion of Link Layer use of AX.25 > Subject: RE: [ax25-layer2] different perspective? > > A stable topology is desirable. It is all but unobtainable on > HF. Is NSR thus limited to non-HF channels? If so, what kind No, NSR works on HF too because, in most cases, you do not want to digipeat on HF due to bandwidth constraints. Therefore, the topology (or paths in this case) are actually very static on HF since most everything should be direct. What isn't static on HF is whether you can reach a particular station or not but that is also true on the higher frequencies to a lesser degree due to mobile/portable operation and band openings. So any discovery must, as Wes pointed out, be able to adapt to whether an endpoint is on the LAN or not. 73, Pete Loveall AE5PL
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] KISS Flow Control?
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] KISS Flow Control?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ax25-layer2 mailing list
