[ax25-layer2] Layer Two Ideas?
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduThu Sep 15 16:43:21 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] Layer Two Ideas?
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] Layer Two Ideas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 15, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Glenn Thomas wrote: > I like this! Another more general question (frame format related) is, > do we want to require some form of data compression? Well, shifting the bits around so that the ASCII values for the callsign characters are encoded in fewer bits could be considered a form of compression... > Oh, a modern microprocessor used for this application may well be > something like the AIM chip - not too far from a Cray-1 in processing > power. Stuff like data compression and EDAC-in-firmware will not tax > its processing resources. There are pretty potent microprocessors out there, but I think that any new version of the protocol should be able to pass a test like "will it run on a PIC16F84 / MC68HC908 / other similarly sized device?" IMO, general payload compression should be left to a higher layer, and layer 2 should be simple enough to implement so that it can be implemented on reasonably sized microcontrollers. -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] Layer Two Ideas?
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] Layer Two Ideas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ax25-layer2 mailing list
