[ax25-layer2] 7-byte address proposal
Barry White bewhite at bigpond.net.auWed Aug 2 11:08:26 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] 7-byte address proposal
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] 7-byte address proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Perhaps Samuel you could have a look at the work being done with FPAC. It is an X.25 network system using AX25 for users and X.25 in the network. There is an older DOS application and the currently operational Linux version. 73 Barry VK2AAB Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: > On 8/1/06, scott at opentrac.org <scott at opentrac.org> wrote: > >> I do think a better mail spec is needed. Again, haven't had time to look > > > Interesting comment -- what precisely do you mean by this? I've never > used e-mail via packet BBSes, due to lack of connectivity in my area. > Can you describe some things you'd like to see different? > > I'm very interested in seeing what folks have in mind for the layer-3 > protocol requirements as well. I've got quite a few ideas that, well, > aren't exactly looked highly upon by the networking crowd these days > (e.g., wrapping TCP streams into AX.25 virtual circuits, perhaps with > lessons learned from OpenTRAC's multi-packet-in-a-packet stuff). > However, I haven't seen any documents on OpenTRAC yet, and > opentrac.org doesn't come up in my browser, and SourceForge has no > homepage for the project. > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/404 - Release Date: 31/07/2006
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] 7-byte address proposal
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] 7-byte address proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ax25-layer2 mailing list
