[ax25-layer2] Re: EDAC vs HDLC
Barry White bewhite at bigpond.net.auFri Aug 4 23:56:01 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] Re: EDAC vs HDLC
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] Re: EDAC vs HDLC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks Glenn for the info on what EDAC is about. There is no point in worrying about HF as Pactor has fixed that problem and works right down to the noise. I daily forward with F2PY & N7QDN all WW buls & msgs and would not consider any form of packet on HF. Pactor is able to dedicate a single frequency to a one to one connection whereas packet needing to share frequencies is in need of a totally different protocol. 73 Barry VK2AAB Glenn Thomas wrote: > EDAC = Error Detection And Correction. aka FEC, ECC and probably other > things as well. On HF, many packets are received with errors. The > question is, is EDAC/FEC/ECC overhead less costly than multiple retries. > On V/UHF, probably not - though that may change with higher data rates. > On HF, dunno - that is the question I posed a day or two ago and you've > helpfully repeated below. > > 73 de Glenn wb6w > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/409 - Release Date: 4/08/2006
- Previous message: [ax25-layer2] Re: EDAC vs HDLC
- Next message: [ax25-layer2] Re: EDAC vs HDLC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ax25-layer2 mailing list
