Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[bbssig] NanoSail-D

Jim Alles kb3tbx at gmail.com
Fri Jan 28 03:20:47 UTC 2011

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim Alles <kb3tbx at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: NanoSail-D
To: Bill V WA7NWP <wa7nwp at gmail.com>

I am not too worried about the satellite, it's battery was expected to die.


I was scanning 437.260 -- 437.280, with a simple indoor antenna, in central

just wondering if the packet copied makes sense to another application.

It could be there is someone local I am not aware of...


On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Bill V WA7NWP <wa7nwp at gmail.com> wrote:

> First message to BBSSig in years.   Anybody here have an ideas on the
> Nono Sail packet?   No frequency was listed.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jim Alles <kb3tbx at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM
> Subject: [bbssig] Fwd: NanoSail-D
> To: bbssig at tapr.org
> Hello, new here, I hope someone can point me in the right direction.
> Does The packet below look familiar to anyone?
> I was listening for the satellite beacon, and I believe I heard it a
> couple days at about the right time.  I was unable to decode any
> packets before it lost power.  However, on Sunday afternoon, I decoded
> this packet while on frequency:
> fm ? to RS0.<&-6 QSO Nr 1068 I31+ pid=55
> .\[
> It is not the proper format for NanoSail, and I am not familiar w/
> Packet at all.
> Does it make any sense to you?  Anything more than a local coincidence?
> Thanks,
> Jim A. KB3TBX
> _______________________________________________
> bbssig mailing list
> bbssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bbssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/bbssig/attachments/20110127/64838530/attachment.htm>

More information about the bbssig mailing list