[digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
Ken Linder (kc7rad) kc7rad at radstream.comThu Oct 28 20:01:40 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Next message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks all for the info... I have been experimenting with a codex called speex (www.speex.org) and can get decent results down to about 5kbps, just after the first night. I am sure I can get it down less than that. There is a LOT of header overhead with AX.25 and that is something that will have to be death with for my little project. I was hoping to overcome this problem by going to very high speeds. I just purchased a Kantronics TNC, supposedly capable of up to 32kbps and even 56kbps with a little circuit change. I have been looking around for some alternate protocol that gives a larger data segment. Any suggestions??? 73s Ken KC7RAD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolai Heilemann" <nicolai_oliver.heilemann at student.fh-reutlingen.de> To: "TAPR Digital Voice Mailing List" <digi-voice at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet > > I have done some LPC tests on a 9k6 channel using RAT (Robust Audio Tool > by the University College of London) with focus on speech quality > assessment. The result where not too uplifting. (Or lets face it: I proved > that it works in principle, but don't expect more ;) ). > > In general a 9k6 channel is able to transport speech if you compress it > down to 2kBit or so, (not more as with AX.25 you have an awfull lot of > packet header overhead), but as you can expect with such a high > compression the speech is extremely vulnerable to packet losses (which > will occur quite often as you cannot use balanced mode but have to send > everything as UI frames as you would end up with no real time any more > otherwise), so it simply sounds quite poor. > > Anyway it would be interesting to use more sophisticated codecs (CELP or > MELP-based or so) which deliver a higher speech quality by themselves than > LPC and see whether this would lead to satisfying results. > > If you are interested in some detailed results, I am happy to share, and I > also would be awfully interested in the outcome of your experiments of > course. > > Vy 73 es 55 de > > Nicolai, DL9TS > >> At 01:09 AM 28/10/2004, you wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Is there anyone on the list that knows whether anyone is doing anything >>> with digital audio over packet? Any info would be appreciated. >> >> >> I have heard of the occasional station using Speak Freely running LPC-10 >> over 9600 bps packet with reasonable results (on a clear channel). >> >> 73 de VK3JED >> http://vkradio.com >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>digi-voice mailing list >>digi-voice at lists.tapr.org >>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/digi-voice >> > > > _______________________________________________ > digi-voice mailing list > digi-voice at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/digi-voice > > >
- Previous message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Next message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the digi-voice mailing list
