[digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
John B. Stephensen kd6ozh at verizon.netSun Oct 31 02:57:22 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Next message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Is this a QAM-modulated audio subcarrier over FM or SSB? Another approach to consider for an NBFM radio would be multi-level FSK. This would be similar to MFSK16 on HF. 4 levels at 9600 Baud produces 19.2 kbps and 8 levels 28.8 kbps. The data can be encoded so that there is no DC component. 73, John KD6OZH ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Sampson" <k5okc at cox.net> To: "TAPR Digital Voice Mailing List" <digi-voice at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Saturday, 30 October, 2004 23:12 UTC Subject: Re: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet > I'm working with some soundcard linux code to do QAM (had a break in > experimenting due to a very busy year), but the author thinks a standard radio > could do 14k4 bps at 3k6 baud. I have a couple of yaesu radios with digital > jacks on them, and have connected them up to Rascal serial port interfaces, > and hope to begin long range testing in the coming months. I also changed > over to a couple of imbedded PC's which have a built-in soundcard, so the > whole thing is about the size of a CD drive. > > The one thing that excites me about QAM is that it doesn't need to work down > to DC like the G3RUH modem does. For example 9k6 QAM fits in a > 180 - 3420 Hz bandwidth, and a 14k4 would fit in about 4.5 kHz. Heck with > that speed, you could use many Internet voice/video software packages and IP. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John B. Stephensen" > > > > However, 4.5kbps CELP sounds much better. I know that many have been using 9.6 > > kbps FSK for high-speed packet in the VHF bands, but there are also 38.4 and > > 76.8 kbps modems available from Symek that can be used on our UHF bands (and > > 219-220 MHz). Has anyone tried digital voice or digital video at these speeds? > > > > Given that the ARRL is proposing 100 kHz bandwidth digital modes for VHF and may > > extend that to 200 kHz, even the 6 meter band could be used for high-speed > > packet in the near future. > > > > _______________________________________________ > digi-voice mailing list > digi-voice at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/digi-voice
- Previous message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Next message: [digi-voice] Digital voice over high-speed packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the digi-voice mailing list
