[dsp] Analog front end design
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgTue Apr 26 04:37:53 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [dsp] Analog front end design
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Good to know. I read a paper on that modem (or a similar one - 'The new G3RUH software modem for the DSP56002EVM', Etxebarria et al) but I don't remember seeing anything on the specs of the processor. I should be able to get by with less work since I'm only going for 9600 baud and I won't need to worry about the multirate filtering and such. Yeah, higher rates would be fun, but in this country at least we've still got thousands of hams running TNC-2s, and many of those don't even run KISS mode. An affordable 9600 baud TNC would be a big step up. =] I *think* I'm going to go ahead and use a dual-channel 16-bit CODEC for the full version of the TNC, rather than the on-board ADC. It might save me a couple of external op amps, should reduce CPU interrupt overhead thanks to PDC driven data transfers, and with the sigma-delta converters and decimation filters should reduce the hardware filtering requirements. If I was building it only for 1200 baud I'd go with a filter designed for Bell 202, but I want to keep it as open as possible for future expansion. If someone wants to write a POCSAG decoder, or WEFAX, or SSTV, or whatever, I don't want the hardware getting in the way. I'm also thinking about an analog switch matrix. It might be needed to switch inputs between the 1200 and 9600 baud pins on the mini-DIN connectors, and I figure it should be possible to set it up to cross-connect the two channels and use the device as a repeater controller. I really need to do some more research on that, though. But it's got plenty of storage for digital voice playback... On the subject of the dual-port design, I think I can do that for less than twice the CPU load of a single channel. Once a set of coefficients have been loaded into registers, it'll take less overhead to run the same operations on two sets of samples at the same time. Guess I'll find out when I start writing the code. Scott -----Original Message----- From: doug at dougbraun.com [mailto:doug at dougbraun.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:04 PM To: TAPR DSP Mailing List; willmore at optonline.net; scott at opentrac.org Cc: dsp at lists.tapr.org Subject: RE: [dsp] Analog front end design The venerable Motorola 56002 EVM has a great G3RUH modem, and it does only 13 MIPS with a 27 MHz clock. And I think 10 bits of ADC resolution is plenty. Its SNR is probably better than you ever get from an actual received FM signal. So go for it... Doug Braun NA1DB www.dougbraun.com
- Previous message: [dsp] Analog front end design
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the dsp mailing list
