[ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption?
Lyle Williams lyle.williams at bigpond.comWed Jul 28 09:25:48 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption?
- Next message: [ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Running SSH/SSL over a WLAN wouldn't prevent non-amateurs from transiting across a network that operates under amateur regs... Lyle Williams VK1KLW CCIE #4916 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Riley (maillist)" <n1bq_list at wulfden.org> To: "Amateur 802.11b Mailing List" <ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 11:36 AM Subject: Re: [ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption? > Ham satellite command uplinks have been encrypted for years with the FCCs > specific blessing ... all quite legal. The encryption's purpose is not to > "obscure" but to provide security. > > In that sense WEP and WPA for that matter are a joke. They demand precious > horsepower from the relatively puny CPU's in the WAPs that they can ill > afford to give up. It would be better to run SSH/SSL and let the big iron on > our laptops and desktops do it with much greater ease. Use of SSH/SSL would > be just as legal as the use of WEP and a damned sight more manageable. > > Here in the Burlington, VT area Univ of Vermont runs an enormous (50-75 > WAPs) wireless network using this method with great success and pretty good > throughput. > > On 6/23/04 11:53 AM, "Walt DuBose" <dubose at texas.net> wrote: > > > Without getting into details, Gerry and I are quite confident that > > encryption for the purpose of access/authentication control are > > acceptable to the FCC...we just need to sniff out at what level the FCC > > would be comfortable with. Additionally, I personally believe that they > > were concerned with obscuration on frequencies below 2M anyway (this > > from orignal FCC documents fo 30-40 years ago) and perhaps today only on > > frequencies 900 MHz and up and especially where we share frequencies. > > In fact, they may not give a hoot if we encrypt or not on the higher > > bands. But that's just my feeling. > > > _______________________________________________ > ham-80211 mailing list > ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211 >
- Previous message: [ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption?
- Next message: [ham-80211] Re: WEP encryption?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
