[Ham-80211] Access control suggestions
Steve Lampereur kb9mwr at yahoo.comThu Nov 4 06:18:21 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Access control suggestions
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Access control suggestions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff, It would not surprise me if Icom was trying to discourage hams from using WiFi. I wasn't the one in contact with Icom for the evaluation we did here in Green Bay, but I don't remember any off the wall stuff like that. One of the Icom reps lives here in town and I think he knows talking down WifI to us would be dumb, but on the same token I'm sure that's why we had a chance to evaluate the D-Star. Cha-Ching free word of mouth publicity! The only thing that caught me a bit off guard is when the units had to suddenly be sent back. Supposedly in the not to distant future there will be a "second generation" that we might get to also evaluate. I'm not sure was meant by that. It could be as simple as a clear up of some firmware issues. (There were a couple minor ones). Or maybe Icom has another plan up their sleeve. Either way I guess to me WiFi is still alot more practical since the D-star for most hams is way out of their price range. And I hear you on the "non-compatible" fork of GPL code. And yes from what I have queried changing frequency isn't a practical option. While I don't actively follow it, I do from time to time I check... Hoping someone with better programming knowledge that I will start the footwork for ham firmware of sorts. Steve
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Access control suggestions
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Access control suggestions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
