[Ham-80211] Re: 802.16e?
nz8r at att.net nz8r at att.netTue Apr 12 20:59:25 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] 802.16e? not approved
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: 802.16e?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Agree 100%, there is always the requirement for the FCC hurdle, and certainly adhering to a standard helps with that, however most products get type acceptance without a standard. Greg nz8r -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Bill Vodall" <wa7nwp at jnos.org> > > > > > I agree it may be an opportunity, though you'll find a challenge importing > > non-type-accepted equipment in other than your suitcase. > > Interesting issue... As long as it's commerical equipment for amateur > operation, won't we be faced with just the incidental emmisions type acceptance > that any commercial ham transceiver or even computerized receiver has to > comply with. > > It's my understanding that 'foreign' standards, at least European ones, for > incidental emissions from equipment is stricter then U.S. standards... I > wonder how all that plays out. It certainly won't be worth the effort for > a non-US manufactor to invest much in compliance certification for the > "booming" US Amateur market. > > Maybe it's time to check the thrift stores for bigger suitcases. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > ham-80211 mailing list > ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] 802.16e? not approved
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: 802.16e?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
