Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[Ham-80211] Continental & Logan

ki6nj at comcast.net ki6nj at comcast.net
Wed Aug 31 13:24:08 UTC 2005


Roy,
I have no problem receiving that sort of information. in fact I like to be apprised about the real world, but as a countermeasures career specialist in my former life I am somewhat suspicious about the claims of the products.
73 Max 

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> 
> Here are some products to solve the problem more easily: 
> 
> http://www.forcefieldwireless.com/products.html 
> 
> I do not work for or sell these products. 
> 
> Fred, N5JXO 
> 
> Fred Juch, - Solution Manager - Metro Mobility 
> Hewlett-Packard Mobility, Voice & Network Solution Organization 
> 14231 Tandem Boulevard 
> Austin, TX 78728 
> Internet Fred.Juch at hp.com 
> Voice (512) 692-9648 
> 
> 
> Let me know if you prefer not to receive these e-mails from me. 
> For more information regarding HP's privacy policy or to obtain contact 
> information, please see HP's privacy statement at: 
> http://thenew.hp.com/country/us/eng/privacy_intent.html 
> +hp = everything is possible 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org 
> [mailto:ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of KC2MMi 
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 12:26 PM 
> To: ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org 
> Subject: [Ham-80211] Continental & Logan 
> 
> >From 
> >http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2213A1.pdf, the 
> FCC states that Continental alleges the area (louge) is under their 
> exclusive access and control and therefore Logan must butt out. Seems 
> like the attorneys on both sides have missed the obvious solution: 
> Shield the club room! Install shielding in the walls so that 
> Continental's wifi signals are trapped in the exclusive flyers-club room 
> and the problem is solved. 
> Better yet, Continental can assure their members of better security and 
> ensure that non-members can't steal use of the system either. 
> 
> Lawyers. Idiots. Too many of each on both sides of this one! The basic 
> issue is whether contract law can speak "against" other rights, and 
> that's a subject only the courts can and will rule on. (And they have 
> ruled both ways, and continue to do so.) 
> 
> Anyone want to send a couple thousand feet of tin foil to Continental? 
> And a five-figure consulting fee bill? 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> ham-80211 mailing list 
> ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org 
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> ham-80211 mailing list 
> ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org 
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/ham-80211/attachments/20050831/7928ba97/attachment.htm 


More information about the ham-80211 mailing list