[Ham-80211] 802.11 MAC design rational
Hal Feinstein hfeinstein at cox.netWed Jan 5 05:47:53 UTC 2005
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Followup on 4.4 mile link problem posted May 2004
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm trying to gain a better understanding of the logic behind choices made in the design of the MAC layer. For example, there are different ways to handle the hidden transmitter problem (none very good) so why did 802.11 choose to use the CTS/RTS reservation? Where alternatives considered and rejected? Another question I'm trying to trace down is about QoS. 802.11 uses simple non-DCF polling as an option for more intense traffic. Check the work of the 802.11e to see whats being planned for improved QoS. Many of the choices are now thought to be suboptimal and I see that there's a lot of research going on to find and define fixes. Check the work of the 802.11e to see whats being planned for improved QoS. But, I'd like to better understand how the original choices were selected. I haven't been able to find much of the design rational documented and I'd be interested to know if anyone has come across this sort of thing, perhaps in a book, conference paper or IEEE pub? Thanks -- hal (wb3kdu)
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Followup on 4.4 mile link problem posted May 2004
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
