[Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet
Brian Webster bwebster at wirelessmapping.comSun Oct 9 01:44:33 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet (Mark Miller)
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larry, I will echo your idea but take it one step further. We ally ourselves with groups that could use our technical expertise to restore their own communications systems and/or establish a suitable infrastructure to replace what will not be repaired in the short term. This was the thought I had when I went down to help the Wireless Internet teams that were featured in the NY times/Associated press articles. I knew that the need for typical voice traffic at whatever locations would be short lived and it would take me longer to get there than they would need the help. Being there to help build infrastructure to let them become self reliant was my goal and what worked for the team I helped. For hams that want to help out longer term, than say the first 3 to 5 days after an emergency, this is what the plan should be. Take the time to bring things with you that can build something they can use later on without the hams and their own personal gear. This is one of the spirits of amateur "give the government a pool of trained communicators in a time of need". If all we want to do is talk on HF and VHF nets and do nothing else, we will lose a bunch more spectrum. Like it or not. When OTHER (read - the pressure from the commercial wireless industry) groups can make more use of spectrum and do it to benefit a larger segment of the population, it is the governments duty to make it so. We are not entitled to the spectrum if others can make better use of it for more people. I'm sure that statement will start a flame war, but sometimes we need to look at the reality from the other side of the fence. Hams would have been a huge help to the wireless internet service providers I went down to help. These guys went in without any sponsorship (including government) and decided they were just going to get it done and now. Hams could have helped climb towers to align dishes on microwave paths, install wireless radios at the agencies who needed the communications, set up the computer networks/routers, install VOIP phone systems and any other communications related tasks. These are all the technologies the pool of current hams can deal with. The no-code tech license brought a lot of new technical people in to the ranks that know how to make these things work. As hams were are also trained how to do it under adverse conditions. The dealing with adversity is what would help others get through the disaster and make things happen. Something as simple as me rolling in with my own camper with a hot shower was a huge help. As a ham I knew I wanted to show up self contained. All the other folks there had no concept of this, but they did have a willingness to do things and make a difference. We are communicators, no matter how we get it done and with whatever technology and frequencies should make no difference. Review your EMCOMM I manual, it states this. We need to continue to think outside the box and make it happen where others can't. When we stop doing that, ham radio dies and the spectrum becomes more valuable to the people of America who own it, to do other things. Thank You, Brian Webster N2KGC Catskill District EC NY GSEC USNR Retired RF Engineer and Consultant Taxpayer/American Citizen -----Original Message----- From: Larry Cerney [mailto:lcerney at viawest.net] Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 8:09 PM To: 'TAPR Mailing List for Ham Radio Use of 802.11' Subject: RE: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet (Mark Miller) -----Original Message----- From: ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Alex Fraser Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:29 AM To: TAPR Mailing List for Ham Radio Use of 802.11 Subject: Re: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet (Mark Miller) We hams should just do what we do best with out the huge bureaucracy and it's culture of restrictions and control. Hams could be so much more agile and the country would be much better served too. [Larry Cerney] A group of Hams from the Colorado DRT (Disaster Response Team) came back from N.O., LA. and Miss. with some valuable lessons learned. The one that really stands out is the cellular phone companies were climbing all over one another to restore cell service when the Colorado DRT was finally asked to come down and help out two weeks after the K event. They were given assignments in both states and each time they arrived at a location after a long and hazardous drive, they were told "Thanks, but cell service is back." The DRT spent a great deal of time and effort to get in to the affected area and didn't do a heck of a lot of good.(their words, not mine) The suggestion was made that the Hams (ARES & RACES, but less so RACES who are pseudo-governmental) should make all possible effort to provide the initial response to event like hurricanes and earthquakes and not wait for the governmental agencies to get it together long enough to think "Oh yeah, Ham radio operators." I would suggest that the ORGANIZED Ham radio groups (ARES, RACES, Red Cross and SA communications and others) start to move to staging areas outside the effected areas, but with in a 8 hour drive, and contact the Section Coordinator for the area and notify them of the assets they have available. Use those assets outside the effected area to set up resource nets on HF and stand by to move in early and keep an eye out behind you for Cell companies and their herd of COWs! 73... Larry K0ANI Former East Slope of Colorado EC _______________________________________________ ham-80211 mailing list ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet (Mark Miller)
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: Emergency Wireless Internet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
