[Ham-80211] Re: High power 2.4 GHz rules change
KC2MMI (Jared) kc2mmi at verizon.netFri May 19 16:34:42 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] OT??? High power 2.4 GHz rules change
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: High power 2.4 GHz rules change
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
<<And what did the hams pay for their bands? >> Literally? Hams have "paid" for their licenses, and their bands, by signing a mortgage on their lives. Don't forget, the reason that hams are required to demonstrate CW proficiency is to provide a pool of trained radio operators for military draft. If there was a war emergency requiring radio operators "NOW"...Yes, that's what your CW requirement was for. That's why the bands aren't auctioned off to cash bidders, having an incentive for the civilian draft pool is worth more. Now that the military has moved away from CW and field repairable radios...Hams may well just become hobbyists, and lose allocations. Cell phone versus WISP data rates are something else again, you are talking about *marketing*. Only a cellco could convince customers to pay ten cents per SMS message (taking maybe 1/10th of a second on the data channel) when the same dime will buy them a full minute, 600x more time, on the voice channel. If hams could be that persuasive, we'd own the air and get paid every time we hit the tx key!
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] OT??? High power 2.4 GHz rules change
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: High power 2.4 GHz rules change
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
