[Ham-80211] Re: 2.4 GHz remote broadcast
Steve kb9mwr at yahoo.comSat Feb 17 12:19:12 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: 2.4 GHz remote broadcast test
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: 2.4 GHz remote broadcast test
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That's not how I understand things. Logic says a licensed service should have priority over unlicensed. Unless prehaps the allocation table says otherwise. Could you site some regulations or provide an example? Relevant Example: 2400-2483.5 is allocated to ISM (Part 18) Primary (for the most part), everyone else licensed, government, amateur, etc has to yield to them, and deal with any potential interference from them. Taking this a step further, Part 15 on the same band of overlapping frequencies has the lowest position, where they have to yield and deal with all of the above. Common Part 15 general rule of thumb: This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. -----Original Message----- There are quite a few shared-use chucks of spectrum out there which Part 15 makes us secondary in most cases. Tim
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: 2.4 GHz remote broadcast test
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Re: 2.4 GHz remote broadcast test
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
