[Ham-80211] RE: ham-80211 Digest, Vol 30, Issue 3
ussailis at shaysnet.com ussailis at shaysnet.comFri Jul 6 23:26:28 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: Ubiquiti Networks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Several years back I added a polarimetric mod to the precursor to the NEXRAD weather radar. I believe it was on 2.84 GHz. The NEXRAD Doppler radars are in S-band. The tech specs say 2.7 to 3.0 GHz. This would mess up any useage there as the radars run about 3/4 MW pk, about 1KW average, and have an antenna gain around 45 dBi. Not an incidental signal level. NEWRAD is the National Weather Service Doppler weather radar, not to be confused with those TV station Doppler radars, which I believe operate in C-band. Jim, W1EQO Original Message: ----------------- From: ham-80211-request at lists.tapr.org Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:01:21 -0400 (EDT) To: ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org Subject: ham-80211 Digest, Vol 30, Issue 3 Send ham-80211 mailing list submissions to ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ham-80211-request at lists.tapr.org You can reach the person managing the list at ham-80211-owner at lists.tapr.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ham-80211 digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Ubiquiti Networks (Steve Lampereur) 2. Re: Re: Ubiquiti Networks (David Josephson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:29:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Lampereur <kb9mwr at yahoo.com> Subject: [Ham-80211] Re: Ubiquiti Networks To: ham-80211 <ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org> Message-ID: <743844.8636.qm at web50103.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Depends on who "they" is, I'd imagine. Ubiquiti is obviously marketing some of their products (2.5-2.7 GHz & 2.7-2.9 GHz products ) for licensed users. There is a small 3 GHz license free allocation in some countries, and last I check it was a proposal in the US. So who are the users of their 2.5-2.7 GHz & 2.7-2.9 GHz products ? I can guess but thats about it. Original Message: ----------------- I don't think that anything in the 1 - 2 GHz band would get FCC approval. What freq would they use? Check out the FCC site. I can't find the 3 GHz units there. I didn't know 3.6 GHz is a license-free freq, so I went looking. All the info is at www.fcc.gov/oet click on equipment authorization. Their Grantee code is SWF. Their product IDs all have a dash in them, ie; SWF-SR5, so the product code is '-SR5' Jim, W1EQO ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:22:46 -0700 From: David Josephson <dlj at bach.altaphon.com> Subject: Re: [Ham-80211] Re: Ubiquiti Networks To: steve at gbppr.org, "TAPR Mailing List for Ham Radio Use of 802.11" <ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org> Message-ID: <468DD1A6.6020308 at altaphon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Steve Lampereur wrote: > Depends on who "they" is, I'd imagine. Ubiquiti is > obviously marketing > some of their products (2.5-2.7 GHz & 2.7-2.9 GHz > products ) for licensed > users. There is a small 3 GHz license free allocation > in some countries, and last I check it was a proposal > in the US. > > So who are the users of their 2.5-2.7 GHz & 2.7-2.9 > GHz products ? I can > guess but thats about it. There are many licensed allocations in the 2-3 GHz band. Most are "repurposed" point-to-point microwave, educational TV and LMDS/MMDS allocations. The wireless carriers have been aggressive in acquiring as much of this spectrum as they can, and running various wireless internet services on this band, often at a loss, and then folding them into new cell phone offerings. Tracking these licenses down in the FCC database is tricky because in many cases only the original license is shown -- Bozo Community College District might show up for instance, but no way to know that they leased the spectrum to Nextel. Many of the new licenses are based on regional allocations and individual transmitter sites aren't even in the database. -- David WA6NMF ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ham-80211 mailing list ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211 End of ham-80211 Digest, Vol 30, Issue 3 **************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Re: Ubiquiti Networks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
