[Ham-80211] WAP54 bridge trouble

[Larry]

I like that idea, I will try it.
:)
thanks

Schneider TV & Electronic Inc.
5415 N. Wooster ave.
Dover, Ohio 44622       www.geocities.com/schntv2000/
330-343-0768         FCC. first class & Extra class K8WLY


Juch Iii, Roy F (Fred Juch) wrote:
> Try setting the link to use 802.11B only. The units may be trying to go
> to too high a modulation level for the interference to handle. A working
> 11 MB link is better than a non working 54 MB link. This would need to
> be set on both ends.
> 
> Fred N5JXO 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:ham-80211-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Larry
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:03 AM
> To: TAPR Mailing List for Ham Radio Use of 802.11
> Subject: Re: [Ham-80211] WAP54 bridge trouble
> 
> I agree it is probably the leaves, but it seemed strange how it will
> down load data for a few minutes than get lost.
> then after a period, work for a few minutes again.
> I was hoping there were some tweaking I could do to the WAP54 setup.
> also there are days it works perfect then maybe the rain or humidity
> changes and its gone.
> As someone mentioned, it is a very strong link, if there were no trees.
> so I wonder if more power or more antenna gain would even help.
> my antenna is up about 40 ft. but the neighbors trees are about 80 ft.
> I cant afford to go that high as a test.
> How can I tell if another station is blocking my signal.
> I have tried different channels with little success.
> how about even a microwave oven interfering?
> 
> I am considering buying an amp, I never used one, what would the group
> recommend?
> 
> thanks again,
> larry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Schneider TV & Electronic Inc.
> 5415 N. Wooster ave.
> Dover, Ohio 44622       www.geocities.com/schntv2000/
> 330-343-0768         FCC. first class & Extra class K8WLY
> 
> 
> Joe S. Borovetz wrote:
> 
>>The trees are the major problem. I have seen it happen time and again 
>>on
>>2.4 wireless LAN links......not using 802.11 but the same applies for 
>>wi-fi.
>>
>>I have a friend who did links for a major oil company and they 
>>confirmed time and again that trees and 2.4 do not mix. The same goes
> 
> for 5.8.
> 
>>Motorola Canopy which is usually reliable died in the presence of
> 
> trees.
> 
>>Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ham-80211 mailing list
>>ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org
>>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ham-80211 mailing list
> ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ham-80211 mailing list
> ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
> 
>