[Ham-80211] Ubiquiti SR9
Steve n0fpf at att.netTue Mar 6 04:55:33 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Ubiquiti SR9
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Ubiquiti SR9
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It would be really interesting if you can do 900mhz mesh network. In the Seattle area I could see the noise level of about -40db to -30db in the downtown area. There is a lot of 900Mhz stuff out there in an urban area. gotta watch the rules in that freq range too... Steve N0FPF At 12:56 PM 3/5/2007, you wrote: >Alright, perhaps I should have posted more about it. > >http://www.ubnt.com/sr9_faq.php4 >http://www.wlanparts.com/product/SR9 > >It's about the same price as the Aerocomm ConnexLink, but a lot >faster. At almost a watt, comparable power. While the Aerocomm >units are FHSS, these are not, they are 802.11 like clones, so you >can have them in 802.11b = DSSS or 802.11g = OFDM. > >I found a new notes: >There are a few requirements one must follow with SR9 cards, that >have been pointed out by Ubiquiti: >*) The card does not perform well if rate exceeds 18Mbps >*) 802.11b mode is recommended, as 802.11g is very prone to >interference with the SR9 >*) You must use long preamble at all times >This persons testing has shown that the optimal TX power setting is 15. > >I stumbled into only one other report so far. Where they "punched 5 >miles through some trees and houses. Using attic mounted antennas >(13db) and the Ubiquiti SR9 cards they could get a signal to noise >between 10 and 20 and move a couple of megs of data at the home." > >Since 2.4 is so trashed, this is interesting. And I'd like to hear >more reports where people use them in similar "less than ideal" >situations. I noticed they sell a 900MHz Cavity Filter, so that >makes you wonder if thats going to be needed or for just really bad areas... > >You could add a 3 watt Hyperlink bidierectional amp to it, for plug >and play people. It really boils down to how well it does with >other near by signals. But even with that pricey amp, you beat the >price comparison to a D-Star ID-1 setup. > >Those are my thoughts. I'd like to hear more about it. > >_______________________________________________ >ham-80211 mailing list >ham-80211 at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ham-80211
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Ubiquiti SR9
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Ubiquiti SR9
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
