[Ham-80211] Activity - comments and idea
Eric S. Johansson esj at harvee.orgWed Jan 30 06:13:23 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Activity - comments and idea
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Activity - comments and idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Josephson wrote: >> > The most effective throughput is dependent on too many different > parameters to throw a dart and say one method is better. What do you > mean by "bandwidth requirements we have for 2m and 70cm"? What sort of > traffic do you want to pass? why the focus on 2 m and 440. I know the bands are virtually empty except for a brief period around rush hour but most that territory has been claimed. The 220 band is almost completely vacant except for empty repeaters and we have a megahertz or so around to 19 specifically for data transmission (channelized, 100 kHz wide channels). ---eric -- Speech-recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct some.
- Previous message: [Ham-80211] Activity - comments and idea
- Next message: [Ham-80211] Activity - comments and idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ham-80211 mailing list
