[hfsig] Performance of 24/192 soundcards? USB Soundcards
Anthony.N.Martin at marconiselenia.com Anthony.N.Martin at marconiselenia.comFri Sep 24 11:51:54 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [hfsig] Performance of 24/192 soundcards? USB Soundcards
- Next message: [hfsig] Performance of 24/192 soundcards? USB Soundcards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The problem is: if you have a transceiver with bad DC response > a receiver with DFE could still be used. But nobody we a "normal" > receiver can copy your signal well. So you better go and improve > your TX to be "compatible"... I would perhaps make sense to have > something like that in the receiver of the digipeater to allow > the users to have a bad DC response. I agree this could lead to carelessness with coupling the Tx. The philosophy is interesting. It has 2 possible conclusions. * That we should never develop improved modulations as people with old equipment cannot hear us. * That we should always transmit at maximum power in case someone with a small antenna cannot hear us. I would hope that addressing this problem would enable more people to use 9k6 that couldn't use it before as it didn't work for them, and they decided not to buy more hardware. > Question is: is anybody still interested in 9k6 anyway :-( It is popular to use less than 9k6 over HF. I have been asked several times whether I would design a packet modem for standard FM V/UHF radios for >9k6 using a soundcard and the standard mic and spkr connections. They always suggest QAM, but FM radio BW varies so much I think of some kind of rate-adaptive OFDM where we add or drop carriers accordingly and negotiate with the other station to optimise throughput. It is an interesting thought as the existing VHF packet modems were designed using analogue processing and we have not attacked the problem afresh with DSP. As I don't want to spend large sums of money on Microsoft tools that quickly become obsolete, I'm not likely to do it. Unless Mingw come up with a driver development kit. I must admit the AE4JY "pathsim" is excellent, the same program works on Win-95 and Win-2000 and it doesn't have any driver-level code of any kind. Ant M1FDE ----------------------------------------------- This email and any attached files contains company confidential information which may be legally privileged. it is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and solely for the purposes set forth therein. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this email in error please notify the sender by return, delete it from your system and destroy any local copies. It is strictly forbidden to use the information in this email including any attachment or part thereof including copying, disclosing, distributing, amending or using for any other purpose. In addition the sender excludes all liabilities (whether tortuous or common law) for damage or breach arising or related to this email including but not limited to viruses and libel.
- Previous message: [hfsig] Performance of 24/192 soundcards? USB Soundcards
- Next message: [hfsig] Performance of 24/192 soundcards? USB Soundcards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the hfsig mailing list
