[hfsig] VMSK arisen again in new shape and form?
Alberto di Bene
dibene at usa.net
Sat Dec 3 10:08:07 CST 2005
They try to do an explanation here, but I am not convinced...
73 Alberto I2PHD
Robert McGwier wrote:
> I would love to see the SNR required to do 6.24 MBPS in a 5 KHz
> channel. THOU SHALT NOT DEFILE THE LAW GIVEN BY SHANNON. It is crap.
> John Harrison wrote:
>>The promise of a new revolutionary communications technique far better
>>than anything existing, and yet clouded in mystery and secrecy comes
>>from the hitherto unknown company XG Technology (www.xgtechnology.com)
>>I wonder if it is shares origins with the VMSK technique, so
>>successfully shot into oblivion by Phil Karn a couple of years ago
>>I'm a sceptic by nature (especially when something seems to contradict
>>nature), and their web site shows all the characteristics of a scam:
>>professional surface, impressive references, secret methods, no
>>third-party testing, still in lab and the promise to revolutionalize
>>But what do I know. Maybe it works....
More information about the hfsig