[hfsig] Re: [Flexradio] The final nail in the coffin of Morse?
Walt DuBose dubose at texas.netFri Jul 22 01:04:59 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [hfsig] Re: [Flexradio] The final nail in the coffin of Morse?
- Next message: [hfsig] Re: [Flexradio] The final nail in the coffin of Morse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I'd like to see national radio societies establish some kind > of plan for an internationally recognisable certificate of > morse proficiency in the absence of one provided by > government institutions. > I've suggested to several ARRL Directors and the President and I believe that they think this is a goos idea...maybe a green stone in your ARRL logo for 5 WPM, Red for 10 and Diamond for 20...maybe even a REAL diamond chip. Walt/K5YFW Anthony.N.Martin at seleniacomms.com wrote: > > The fact morse is not a regulatory requirement will not > kill it; indeed it has not died in Europe where many > countries have changed the regs. > > >>I agree that people will continue to use it but you >>do have to admit that it is human nature not to >>take on difficult challenges that are not necessary. > > > It will remain an effective tool for DX nevertheless > and many will learn it for this reason. > > I was previously discouraged from getting a ham licence > because I had no interest in morse; but having been > involved for a few years my interest is increasing. > > There are still morse-only contests etc to keep morse > operators active - this is the right way; by encouragement > rather than compulsion when it serves no technical purpose > for lawmaking. > > The real issues we have experienced are this: > > When the licence changes, it will have a big impact on the > infrastructure that teaches morse and provides tests. The > focus must change to where the new students will be coming > from, and their different approach to learning. There will > still be people who want to learn skills and show a recognised > qualification. In the UK we seem to have lost most of the > capacity to do this, and that shouldn't have happened. > > I'd like to see national radio societies establish some kind > of plan for an internationally recognisable certificate of > morse proficiency in the absence of one provided by > government institutions. > > .... > > Note that the CEPT are planning a new intermediate class of > amateur licence for international recognition & roaming. > It would be nice for the US to have forethought and look > to align it's licence structure at this juncture with the > CEPT. > > Ant M1FDE > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This email and any attached files contains company confidential information > which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the person(s) or > entity to which it is addressed and solely for the purposes set forth > therein. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this email > in error please notify the sender by return, delete it from your system and > destroy any local copies. It is strictly forbidden to use the information > in this email including any attachment or part thereof including copying, > disclosing, distributing, amending or using for any other purpose. > > In addition the sender excludes all liabilities (whether tortious or common > law) for damage or breach arising or related to this email including but > not limited to viruses and libel. > > > _______________________________________________ > hfsig mailing list > hfsig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hfsig > >
- Previous message: [hfsig] Re: [Flexradio] The final nail in the coffin of Morse?
- Next message: [hfsig] Re: [Flexradio] The final nail in the coffin of Morse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the hfsig mailing list
