[linux] RE: Take a Stand
Jeff King jeff at aerodata.netSat Oct 9 01:35:15 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [linux] RE: Take a Stand
- Next message: [linux] RE: Take a Stand
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kinda tells ya something there.... We have 10's of thousands of 44 ampr net addresses we are not using...and my guess 95% of the assigned ones are currently unused. Now, there might be good reasons to get a IPv6 block, but at this point in time it most certainly has little to do with hams actually running tcp/ip over radio. And I'm not even sure there is a need for this, as from a routing perspective, it sure doesn't make any sense, assuming you still linked into the internet proper. On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:28:25 -0400, James French W8ISS wrote: >OK.... > >Maybe I'm missing the point here or maybe not. > >What little I understand about the new IPv6 address structure is >that it will give more addresses for usage. > >What is wrong with what we do have under the older APMERnet >addresses? Don't we still have plenty of room there to do what we >want to do and assign one to each and every ham in the world based >on them being licensed? > >James W8ISS > > >_______________________________________________ linux mailing list >linux at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi- >bin/mailman/listinfo/linux
- Previous message: [linux] RE: Take a Stand
- Next message: [linux] RE: Take a Stand
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the linux mailing list
