[linux] Re: Take a Stand
John Koster w9ddd at tapr.orgWed Oct 13 03:30:54 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [linux] Re: Take a Stand
- Next message: [linux] Re: Take a Stand
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I was kind of wondering about that myself. 5 bits will give you 32 combinations. 26 letters plus 0-9 would be 36 code required. What are we missing Darryl? And then what are the two extra odd bits for? John Koster, W9DDD <w9ddd at tapr.org> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Martin Ewing wrote: > > --- Darryl Smith <Darryl at radio-active.net.au> wrote: > > > Now, callsigns are up to 7 alpha-numeric characters, > > meaning 37 bits. > > Am I supposed to understand how you encode callsigns > with 5.28 bits per character? Because I don't! > Myself, I'd prefer 8 bits per character, to make it > easy to manipulate & print, etc. Why not allow more > characters for foreign/portable/etc.? > > I don't suppose callsigns are going to Unicode (16 > bits) any time soon. Maybe ASCII (8 bits) is > acceptable, or even 'BCD' (6 bits). > > Inquiring minds... > 73 - Martin, AA6E > > > _______________________________________________ > linux mailing list > linux at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux >
- Previous message: [linux] Re: Take a Stand
- Next message: [linux] Re: Take a Stand
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the linux mailing list
