[nos-bbs] RF crash victim
George (Skip) VerDuin k8rra at ameritech.netFri Nov 18 22:01:33 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [nos-bbs] RF crash victim
- Next message: [nos-bbs] RF crash victim
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OOPS! My apologies - especially to Jerome. I MISSED the "hex" part (even though I got away with it until today)... George On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:22 -0600, maiko at pcs.mb.ca wrote: > It was written : > > > trace vhf 6111 kam98 > > I've always used the following syntax to trace In/Out on a port : > > trace vhf 0x211 kam98.log > > Note, the log file is not immediately updated (flushed) whenever > something comes in or out. It's buffered. To end the trace, use > the line 'trace vhf off'. That should flush any remaining buffer > to the logfile (in this case kam98.log). I notice normal terminations do not duplicate trace data. So, it looks like abnormal termination processing by FC-4 causes some duplicated data from the buffer. Another annoyance... > > Maiko > > _______________________________________________ > nos-bbs mailing list > nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/nos-bbs/attachments/20051118/3aeea382/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [nos-bbs] RF crash victim
- Next message: [nos-bbs] RF crash victim
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the nos-bbs mailing list
