[nos-bbs] JNOS20E
Steven Stimpson steven736 at gwi.netSun Oct 19 06:55:37 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [nos-bbs] JNOS20E
- Next message: [nos-bbs] JNOS Telnet Problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maiko Langelaar (ve4klm)" <maiko at pcs.mb.ca> To: "Glenn Thomas" <glennt at charter.net> Cc: "TAPR xNOS Mailing List" <nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] JNOS20E Copy/Paste from the jnos11f source Makefile Also, the last 11f release used the same code, all you had to do was rename the makefile. #DEFINE YOUR COMPILER AND PROCESSOR TYPE HERE !!! #VALID COMPILERS are: TC2, BC2, BC3, BC4 #VALID PROCESSORS are: 8086, 80186, 80286, 80386, 80486, PENTIUM # NOTE: 80486/PENTIUM is for BC4 and is NOT tested!!! # BC4 supports 8086, 80186, 80286, 80386, 80486, PENTIUM > Hi Glenn, > >> compiling JNOS 11.1f with Borland C++ 4.0 and 4.5 for some years now. > > That's good to hear. I never had access to those compilers and never > saw any reference to them during the time I did my DOS work. I guess > they are *backwards* compatible to the 3.0 and 3.1 versions. > > QUESTION : did the JNOS 2.0 dos packages compile like they would under > the 3.0 and 3.1 versions *as is*, or did you have to make further changes > that might not be documented in my instructions ? > >> Are these explicitly excluded for JNOS 2.0 builds under DOS ... > > Not anymore they aren't :) I'll update the 'system requirements' section. > > Thank you. > > Maiko > > _______________________________________________ > nos-bbs mailing list > nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
- Previous message: [nos-bbs] JNOS20E
- Next message: [nos-bbs] JNOS Telnet Problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the nos-bbs mailing list
