[time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!!
Steven Bible n7hpr at tapr.orgTue Nov 22 03:38:03 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!!
- Next message: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Peter, Glad to hear you are up and running. I am a little perplexed that you had to change R22. The op amp circuit is to be a non-inverting amplifier with an adjustable offset. Since the op amp is power to +12 volts, you should be able to adjust the trimmer R24 for the necessary frequency control voltage of your OCXO. Was the range insufficent for you? 73, - Steve, N7HPR (n7hpr at tapr.org) > -----Original Message----- > From: time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Peter > Horbaczewskyj > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:34 PM > To: TAPR time and frequency projects > Subject: Re: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!! > > > Hi everyone, > > I've just got my board working using a 1pps reference signal and my 10MHz > oscillator.. > > Changing the feedback resistor R22 from 10K to 68K has given me > sufficient > output voltage from the op amp. > > The pulse out from the XOR output was not 100ns as stated earlier > but 100us > (slip of the keyboard). > > 73, Peter GZXO > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Horbaczewskyj" <peter at microwaves.f9.co.uk> > To: "TAPR time and frequency projects" <time-freq at lists.tapr.org> > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:05 PM > Subject: Re: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - PROGRESS!! > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > As the subject says, I'm making some progress with my setup. > > I've taken Bobby's advice and started to use wire links as > shorts on the > > board. > > Looking at the signals a lot closer with a scope, there actually is a > > signal coming out of the XOR output. > > Not a very big one I have to say though. approx 100ns every so > often, very > > difficult to see. > > Doesn't seem to produce any reaction from the op amp circuitry. > > > > Then I decided to have a go and use the PD2 UP signal. Finally > there is > > some movement > > on the frequency meter. Problem now is that there is not enough > range on > > the output of the > > op amp to reach the magical lock point of 10.0000MHz. Need to > change the > > gain so > > that I can get 5-6V out as there is no other method of adjustment on my > > oscillator. > > > > Perhaps someone can suggest the best way of achieving this. I > assume that > > the > > "Offset Voltage Adjustment" pot will limit the range of the op > amp output. > > > > 73, Peter G4ZXO > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Peter Horbaczewskyj" <peter at microwaves.f9.co.uk> > > To: "TAPR time and frequency projects" <time-freq at lists.tapr.org> > > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:20 AM > > Subject: Re: [time-freq] Reflock II observations > > > > > >> Hi Steve, > >> > >> The oscillator I am using is something that I had in my junk box. > >> Basically it is an OCXO > >> that is controlled by the voltage input from a pot circuit. > The frequency > >> range is about > >> +/- 50Hz either side of 10MHz for a voltage range of 0 to 7.5V. I am > >> currently using the > >> 1pps signal as a reference source and I have tried both the > 1pps config > >> files supplied by > >> Louis. Neither of them it would seem appear to give an output > on the XOR > >> pin on the > >> CPLD. Both the PD2 UP and PD2 DOWN signals are OK. The issue > stems from > >> the lack of > >> signal to the TLC271CD op amp. Next thing to try is the PD2 UP signal. > >> I'l keep you informed > >> of any progress. > >> > >> The board as it stands is very neatly designed and laid out, but it > >> doesn't lend itself very easily to > >> development work or "suck and see" endeavours. Once it works I'm sure > >> that it will be boxed up > >> and quietly forgotten about. > >> > >> 73, Peter G4ZXO > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Steven Bible" <n7hpr at tapr.org> > >> To: "TAPR time and frequency projects" <time-freq at lists.tapr.org> > >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:27 AM > >> Subject: RE: [time-freq] Reflock II observations > >> > >> > >>> Hi Peter, > >>> > >>> You mention 10 Mhz, what is your oscillator and what is your > reference? > >>> > >>> 73, > >>> > >>> - Steve, N7HPR > >>> (n7hpr at tapr.org) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org > >>> [mailto:time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Peter > >>> Horbaczewskyj > >>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 4:01 PM > >>> To: TAPR time and frequency projects > >>> Subject: Re: [time-freq] Reflock II observations > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Bobby, > >>> > >>> I totally agree with you, I've been trying to get my board working > >>> tonight > >>> with not much success at all. > >>> You really need to go through all the files with a fine toothcomb and > >>> drag > >>> out the information, and hope > >>> you've understood it correctly. Currently I am playing with a 10MHz > >>> oscillator but don't seem to be getting > >>> any signals out on the XOR output of the CPLD, using either > of the "pps" > >>> files. The other two outputs PD2 UP > >>> and PD2 DN appear to be behaving as you would expect. However, moving > >>> the > >>> little 0 ohm links to select a > >>> different output is not the easiest thing to do!! Time to get > the scope > >>> out > >>> and have a proper look. > >>> > >>> By the way, I wonder if you realise that Altera provide a standalone > >>> piece > >>> of software for programming > >>> their chips called "Quartus II Programmer" currently at Ver 5.0. This > >>> certainly has the ByteBlaster MV as > >>> an option and is pretty simple to use. > >>> > >>> The circuit that Steve has just published is essentially that one I > >>> built > >>> for my programmer, using a 74HC244 > >>> as the interface. This chip will certainly work down to around 2.0V as > >>> opposed to the LS types which generally > >>> need 5V. > >>> > >>> Time to go away and ponder what might have gone wrong. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards and 73, Peter G4ZXO > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-freq mailing list > >> time-freq at lists.tapr.org > >> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-freq > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-freq mailing list > > time-freq at lists.tapr.org > > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-freq > > > _______________________________________________ > time-freq mailing list > time-freq at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-freq
- Previous message: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!!
- Next message: [time-freq] Reflock II observations - SUCCESS!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the time-freq mailing list
