[time-freq] Re: Announcing the TADD-3 Pulse Distribution Amplifier

[Steven Bible]

Hi Christopher,

Actually, I wouldn't be apposed to added these features you mention on
future Reflock II revisions.  Can you give me an idea of what is needed?

73,

- Steve, N7HPR
 (n7hpr at tapr.org)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:time-freq-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Christopher Hoover
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:44 PM
> To: time-freq at lists.tapr.org
> Subject: [time-freq] Re: Announcing the TADD-3 Pulse Distribution
> Amplifier
>
>
>
>
> > I was wondering, could you do what you need for the TADD-2 with the
> >  RefLock II platform? That's a PLL only because of the configuration
> > file loaded into it. Otherwise, it looks like it could do a divider
> > pretty easily.
>
> You are absolutely right regarding the basic functionality.  I sent out a
> RefLock II conf file with source code to this list about a month or so ago
> that does 10 MHz down to 1 pps.  I cranked that out one evening because I
> needed it and RefLock II was an easy platform to put it on.
>
> Unfortunately RefLock II does't have the multitude of outputs (and output
> flavors) that TADD-2 will have.
>
> (I don't have issue with SMT -- in fact I much prefer it to t/h
> -- but I do
> think we should stick 0603 and up for RCL.)
>
> BTWl, I've been working with John on TADD-2.  The design is such that it
> will be possible to take the VHDL source we have -- and with a
> small bit of
> work -- adapt it to get one of the outputs on RefLock II.
>
> If I have anything to say about it, the source code for TADD-2 will be
> released under GPL or similar license.
>
> -ch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-freq mailing list
> time-freq at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-freq