[time-freq] Linux PPS and FreeBSD issues
John Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.comFri Dec 28 18:56:06 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [time-freq] Linux PPS and FreeBSD issues
- Next message: [time-freq] Linux PPS and FreeBSD issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Gregg -- I'm by inclination a Linux guy, but unfortunately there is some sort of bad juju between the kernel people and the NTP people, and as a result getting decent PPS timekeeping out of Linux is an ongoing challenge. I run FreeBSD (actually, the CF-based nanoBSD version) on my Soekris servers as that seems to be the best way to make things work. There is a shared memory (shm) program called shmpps that can pick up a PPS signal from a serial port and pipe it to NTP, but I've had trouble keeping that going for long uptimes. It's a shame that Linux seems, for reasons I don't understand, to be unable/unwilling to have the necessary kernel stuff to avoid patches, but it's been that way for years and I haven't seen any sign of changes... John ---- Gregg Levine said the following on 12/27/2007 06:43 PM: > Hello! > I've been sorting through and reading messages on news://comp.protocols.ntp . > > It seems to be an interesting study. There is a group there (or it > seems to me to be one.) that prefers FreeBSD exclusively. And there > are people like myself who are concerned with the PPS inclusion into > the Linux kernel. Accordingly there are kits available for this on the > Kernel.org server. But only for 2.6.15.1 and for 2.6.17.8. The author > of the kit is interested in updating this, but he's not clear on when > it would be released for the later 2.6 ones. > > There is even one fellow who has NTP running on his Sun box from the > same time period as the I486DX2, he's got it running rather nicely. > But the big question for me is simply running Linux on hardware from > the same time period, and naturally that's what I've been up to. > > The last I time I investigated FreeBSD was during the ramp up to > version 4.0. I daresay I never got things to work properly then. I've > heard some interesting complaints about building a kernel for that > operating system, versus the others from the BSD family, and Linux. > > Would anyone care to comment?
- Previous message: [time-freq] Linux PPS and FreeBSD issues
- Next message: [time-freq] Linux PPS and FreeBSD issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the time-freq mailing list
