[wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+
Kent Ochs kentochs at sbcglobal.netFri Jul 8 23:52:26 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+
- Next message: [wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John, Ah, I see you are a "9" lander as well. Display says 1.15.0R. I Guess I have some updating to do. Where can I find the latest and greatest code? Thanks. Kent W"9"KAO John Koster <w9ddd at tapr.org> wrote: I had the same problem. What revision of S/W do you have? Updating fixed my problem. I don't have anything handy to check, but I think you need at least 1.5.3 for the 9 land fix. On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Kent Ochs wrote: > Will, > Thanks for the feedback, I have moved forward and completed the > installation of the IC's. All appears well, but I need to complete the > TNC to Radio interface to complete the project. > I attempted to program my callsign into the unit, but can not program > the "9" in my call sign. 0 through 8 are there, then it skips to "A". > Is this some kind of conspiracy against those of us in "9" land:-). > > Thanks. > > Kent > > Will Beals wrote: > Kent: > > Good catch! Given the resistor and diode, it isn't going to be +5V. 3.4V > is about right. I need to fix the manual. > > will > > -----Original Message----- > From: wxsig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:wxsig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On > Behalf Of Kent Ochs > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 9:42 PM > To: wxsig at lists.tapr.org > Subject: [wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+ > > Will, > > Have been tied up the last couple of weeks, but have finally had a chance to > signup on the sig and spend some time working on the unit. > > I have some how gotten past the sensor problem and the unit is now working > properly. > > I have completed the assembly of the modem. The 5 volt tests have checked > out for all tests except the P100 pin 6 test. I am measuring ~ 3.4 volts on > this pin. I have verified r109 (1.2K/brown-red-red), d101 is in correctly > (u100 pin 3 to 16 lights led), and transistor q100 is in correctly. I can > not find any explanation for the lower than 5v reading on this pin. > > Thanks. > > Kent > > Will Beals wrote: > Kent: > > Best to discuss this on the [wxsig] forum so others can see what is going on > too, are you subscribed? > > The message means that the T238+ has discovered and learned a rain gauge > sensor, but no longer sees it on the network. This is a normal thing, I > added that feature to gracefully handle folk that take down their rain > gauges during the winter. I am also pretty certain that is not the issue. > > Because you got that message though, it appears you may be juggling sensors > somehow or have manually programmed in some other sensor IDs. In general > the T238(+) should handle missing sensors OK, but there may be holes in how > gracefully that is handled. If you manually entered sensor IDs, I have done > very little testing on how gracefully the T238(=+) handles typos for sensor > IDs. > > Do either of those situations apply to you? If so, best bet is to re-learn > sensor IDs (starting with old ones to get past the lockup) or to start over > with blank IDs or check for any typos in your ID list. > > will > > > --------------------------------- > From: Kent Ochs [mailto:kentochs at sbcglobal.net] > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 7:09 PM > To: will > Subject: Problem w/ new t-238+ > > > > Will, > > I am please to say that I found no additional documentation errors. I have > successfully completed the checkout of the unit. This is a wonderful kit, > but I have encounter one problem at this point. > > The unit successful goes through the startup messages but seems to hang at > the message "Rain Guage missing! Will ignore sensor." message. > > I am using this with a working AAG 1-wire (V3) weather station. I have > successfully used this unit with my basic stamp system. I have brought the > unit down from the roof and connected it via the supplied AAG cable with the > same results. > > Any suggestions at this point? If you rather I post this on the WX sig I be > glad to post this there. > > Thanks again and 73's > > Kent Ochs > W9KAO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wxsig mailing list > wxsig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wxsig > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wxsig mailing list > wxsig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wxsig > _______________________________________________ > wxsig mailing list > wxsig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wxsig > -- 73, John, W9DDD _______________________________________________ wxsig mailing list wxsig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wxsig
- Previous message: [wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+
- Next message: [wxsig] RE: Problem w/ new t-238+
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the wxsig mailing list
