[wxsig] T-238 Humidity Calibration
Ken Brown Ken.A.Brown at noaa.govTue Sep 6 12:40:03 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [wxsig] T-238 Humidity Calibration
- Next message: [wxsig] Need info on other Weather reflectors and Weather Metrics weather station data format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Will, I have been looking at the graphs on the QC site for many weeks. http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/cgi-bin/wxqchart.pl?site=ar301 My sensor is a TAPR X1W2 or whatever and it is in a Davis aspirated radiation shield. I have taken everything apart and cleaned the shield and sensor several times. From doing QC on the local official stations at the NWS office I believe the data in the qc report to be reasonably accurate so it seems that it must just be my sensor reading high. It would take a while of "curve fitting" during the right weather conditions to make it look good but I think it might work. I can also use a sling psychrometer for quick calibration but would need to watch it over a period of time to see how it looks. I think I running the most recent software prior to the release you made last week. I'll try to track the raw data on the LCD for a while and see what it looks like. Ken Brown Will Beals wrote: > Ken: > > One thing I can do is add some diagnostic data to occasional APRS packets. > I'm doing this now with the gust data to help isolate if I have a sensor > issue or a firmware issue. Once that trial runs it's course, I can add a BP > diagnostic string next. I like it as the data gets appended to an APRS > string that you can then go look at a few days worth of data on findu and > see what happened. > > I have the raw humidity data displayed right now on the LCD diagnostic > screen starting with 1.15.? (forgot). It shows the raw sensor data. The > LCD is handier for issues that are either easily repeatable or happen for a > while (like saturated humidity sensors). > > How confident are you the offset is a constant over both humidity and > temperature? My concern with simply adding an offset is that it makes the > 100% case look good, but in fact may make less obvious readings (ones harder > to verify) even more innacurate. > > will > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken.A.Brown at noaa.gov [mailto:Ken.A.Brown at noaa.gov] > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 6:14 AM > To: will at beals5.com; TAPR Weather Station SIG Mailing List > Subject: Re: RE: [wxsig] T-238 Humidity Calibration > > Will, > > I understand the problem with the BP sensor. You need to use a very accurate > and high resolution volt meter to read the voltages directly on the board > and even then it takes a lot of fooling around to get the span and offset > correct. I had to calibrate mine several times. Each time I would determine > how many millibars in error it was, convert that error to meters of > elevation using the Smithsonian met tables, and compute new voltage values > for the settings. I'm still a bit off but it is real close and tracks well. > I'm still troubled with out lying spikes in the indicated pressure that are > many millibars high, somewhat like the wind gust problem you described. > Most days I get none but other days there may be one or a few, hours apart. > I have never been sitting in front of the > T238 when it happens and only see it in the APRS output packets. I'm sure > it isn't corrupted packets because I see it on my local APRS station and > also in the QC data on the web. > > For humidity my sensors indicate saturation when the RH is only around 95% > and they seem to track about 5% high all the time. I thought maybe scaling > the voltage from the sensor to the one-wire device might work but haven' > tried it yet. > > Ken Brown
- Previous message: [wxsig] T-238 Humidity Calibration
- Next message: [wxsig] Need info on other Weather reflectors and Weather Metrics weather station data format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the wxsig mailing list
