[wxsig] T238+ modem problem update and a question
Mark Patton k0yg at msn.comFri Aug 13 00:52:50 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [wxsig] T238+ modem problem update and a question
- Next message: [wxsig] T238+ modem problem update and a question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted, You were on the right track with the cap idea. C111 is a DC blocking cap on the output side. Yo work with a 100pf it needs to drive a high impedance input on the radio. Most radios are not high impedance enough. I don't have my notes in front of me but try sticking in a .1uf (or even larger) in it's place. I think you will find this will solve your audio problem. This issue has been covered a few times on the forum so you may want to do a search for "low audio" and see what that turns up. i think the resistor issue has also been covered. Good luck getting it working! Mine has been working non-stop for at least 4 years! Mark On 8/12/2010 6:03 PM, Ted11 wrote: > Okay, I think I'm getting this figured out. This is my first packet attempt > and my first kit in a long time, so it's been a slow but very interesting > process. > > First, some typos in the T238 modem assembly manual (Rev 8, March 2006). > Top of page 6, the table listing voltage checks: "C8" should be "C108". > Second, and more importantly, the values for R100 and R101 are switched in > the assembly instructions relative to the schematic. R100 in the schematic > is 100K, in the parts list and construction section is 10K. Similarly, R101 > is 10K in the schematic, and 100K in the instructions. I think the > schematic is correct, as it matches the resistor values in another similar > MX614 project I found on the web. > > Since my problem was no signal out of pin 8 of the DB9 connector, I had high > hopes reducing the resistance from 100K to 10K would fix everything. > Unfortunately, no. But, when I turned the trimpot down all the way, I got a > very faint sound when monitoring my output signal. So, I bypassed R101 and > used only the trimpot for resistance control. I slowly turned down the > resistance, and the signal kept getting louder, until finally I was at 0 > ohms. However, even with no resistance between pin 7 of the MX614 and pin 8 > of the DB9, my signal was still considerably fainter than others I > monitored. Encouragingly, I've seen some packets make it to the internet > (http://aprs.fi/?call=KE6ROS-2), but not as many as I would like. > > Which leads me to another thought: I'm running the output of modem into the > rear panel DB9 input of my Alinco DR-135. According to the manual, it wants > 100mV/600 ohms in. I'm guessing the modem was designed to hook up to a > microphone input, which I would think would be a lower input. Does this > theory make sense? Anybody hook their T238 modem up to this radio, or a > similar one with a DB9 jack? I suppose I can hook the T238 using the > microphone and rear speaker jacks, but was hoping to use the DB9 for a > tidier install. > > Thanks for any help! > > Ted > KE6ROS > > > _______________________________________________ > wxsig mailing list > wxsig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wxsig > >
- Previous message: [wxsig] T238+ modem problem update and a question
- Next message: [wxsig] T238+ modem problem update and a question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the wxsig mailing list
