[wxsig] T238 5 second "live" vs 5 minute averaged modes and reliability
John Bennett jabennett at insightbb.comThu Mar 31 17:51:15 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [wxsig] T238 5 second "live" vs 5 minute averaged modes and reliability
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I was at the site recently and the stable version is 1.14.1C. I brought this up with a number of years ago, but we dropped pursuing it since the above version was reinstalled and stable. -----Original Message----- From: William Beals <will at beals5.com> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:20 AM To: 'TAPR Weather Station SIG Mailing List' <wxsig at tapr.org> Subject: Re: [wxsig] T238 5 second "live" vs 5 minute averaged modes and reliability That is a surprise on the 5-second mode. I must admit that for QC checking I normally checked it for a few minutes to make sure it wasn't broken. I never tested it for a long time. Can you tell me which sensors you have? If you have tried with a subset, that may help narrow down where the issue might be. If you haven't, no need for special tests. will -----Original Message----- From: wxsig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:wxsig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Rich Beckwith Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:16 AM To: TAPR Weather Station SIG Mailing List Subject: Re: [wxsig] T238 5 second "live" vs 5 minute averaged modes and reliability Thanks John. I have been lucky so far, only blown BAT42 diodes. Rich On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:12 PM, John Bennett <jabennett at insightbb.com> wrote: > I use the "live" mode with my wxn server and have run into the exact [The entire original message is not included]
- Previous message: [wxsig] T238 5 second "live" vs 5 minute averaged modes and reliability
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the wxsig mailing list
